MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140421742 · doi:10.1002/pssb.201552219

Synthesis and characterization of TiO<sub>2</sub>/C nanomaterials: Applications in water treatment

2015· article· en· W2140421742 on OpenAlex
Drissa Bamba, Mariame Coulibaly, Carmen Ioana Fort, Liviu Cosmin Coteț, Zsolt Pap, Krisztina Vajda, Elogne Guessan Zoro, Nian Yao, Virginia Danciu, Didier Robert

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (b) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsPhotocatalysisMaterials scienceAdsorptionPhotodegradationChemical engineeringCarbon fibersTitanium tetrachlorideTitaniumCatalysisSpecific surface areaNanomaterialsTitanium oxideInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyComposite numberOrganic chemistryChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The TiO2 deposition on high surface possessing supports can increase the photocatalytic efficiency of a semiconductor, as already shown in the literature because, the high adsorption capacity of the support can help to enrich the organic substrate around the catalyst promoting the charge-transfer process between the pollutants and the photocatalysts. Consequently, in this study, we investigated the synthesis of composite photocatalytic materials based on TiO2 and different types of carbon. Titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) was used as the precursor, while graphite, activated carbon and carbon aerogels were chosen as carbon supports. An optimization of the synthesis method was proposed by varying the molar ratio titanium/carbon (Ti/C). The obtained materials were characterized by XRD, TEM, and UV–Vis DRS. The specific surface area, pore volume, and pore-size distribution were evaluated by nitrogen adsorption/desorption. The photocatalytic activity was investigated by the photodegradation of diuron.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it