MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140423408 · doi:10.1002/jcc.10261

On the transferability of hydration‐parametrized continuum electrostatics models to solvated binding calculations

2003· article· en· W2140423408 on OpenAlexaff
Kathryn N. Rankin, Traian Sulea, Enrico O. Purisima

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransferabilityElectrostaticsChemistryComputational chemistryElectrostatic interactionChemical physicsMolecular dynamicsStatistical physicsPhysicsPhysical chemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using molecular mechanics force field partial atomic charges, we show the nonuniqueness of the parametrization of continuum electrostatics models with respect to solute atomic radii and interior dielectric constant based on hydration (vacuum-to-water transfer) free energy data available for small molecules. Moreover, parameter sets that are optimal and equivalent for hydration free energy calculations lead to large variations of calculated absolute and relative electrostatic binding free energies. Hence, parametrization of solvation effects based on hydration data, although a necessary condition, is not sufficient to guarantee its transferability to the calculation of binding free energies in solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational ChemistrySame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207