Adaptive overrelaxed bound optimization methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study a class of overrelaxed bound optimization algorithms, and their relationship to standard bound optimizers, such as Expectation-Maximization, Iterative Scaling, CCCP and Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. We provide a theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of these optimizers and identify analytic conditions under which they are expected to outperform the standard versions. Based on this analysis, we propose a novel, simple adaptive overrelaxed scheme for practical optimization and report empirical results on several synthetic and real-world data sets showing that these new adaptive methods exhibit superior performance (in certain cases by several times speedup) compared to their traditional counterparts. Our extensions are simple to implement, apply to a wide variety of algorithms, almost always give a substantial speedup, and do not require any theoretical analysis of the underlying algorithm. 1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it