MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140466297 · doi:10.1029/1999gl010884

Latitudinal distribution of atmospheric methyl bromide: Measurements and modeling

2000· article· en· W2140466297 on OpenAlexaff
Yoko Yokouchi, Toshinobu Machida, Leonard A. Barrie, D. Toom‐Sauntry, Yukihiro Nojiri, Y. Fujinuma, Yoko Inuzuka, H. ‐J. Li, Hajime Akimoto, Shuji Aoki

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorthern HemisphereLatitudeSouthern HemisphereEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesTropicsBromideTroposphereClimatologyMiddle latitudesGeologyChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global distribution of atmospheric methyl bromide (CH3Br) obtained from extensive new measurements of atmospheric CH3Br from latitude 82.5°N to 69.1°S, showed a small decrease from mid‐ to high‐latitudes, a gradient between the northern and southern hemispheres with a ratio of 1.2 to 1.3, and occasional high concentrations in the tropics. The observed data and modeled distributions of industrial CH3Br were used to apportion CH3Br between natural and industrial components for both hemisphere. We obtained an estimated man‐made contribution of 4.3 pptv and 2.3 pptv in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively and a natural (non‐industrial) background concentration in both hemispheres of 6 pptv with a slight increase in the tropics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207