MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140479193 · doi:10.1109/icnn.1996.549011

A modular architecture for hybrid VLSI neural networks and its application in a smart photosensor

2002· article· en· W2140479193 on OpenAlexaff
H. Djahanshahi, Majid Ahmadi, G.A. Jullien, William C. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'96) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVery-large-scale integrationComputer scienceScalabilityModular designBlock (permutation group theory)Neuromorphic engineeringCMOSRobustness (evolution)Computer architectureArtificial neural networkComputer hardwareEmbedded systemElectronic engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a modular architecture for the VLSI implementation of multilayer neural networks using a universal hybrid building block. Based on this approach, a programmable smart photosensor is designed which is in fact a VLSI realization of a multilayer feedforward neural network with an integrated photoreceptor array using 1.2 /spl mu/m CMOS technology. Each universal building block in this architecture comprises a multiplying DAC synapse, a portion of a nonlinear distributed neuron and compact digital registers for programming and storing a synaptic weight. The proposed modular neural network architecture features design simplicity and scalability, area efficiency, reduced interconnection problems and increased robustness. Based on this architecture and using cell-level optimization, the synaptic density in this version of the neural-based smart sensor has been increased by a factor of two. This has lead to an increase in the area available for a larger and higher resolution optical input array.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'96)Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207