MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140517207 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2013-0536

Evaluating vehicular emissions with an integrated mesoscopic and microscopic traffic simulation

2014· article· en· W2140517207 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Timothy Sider, Ahsan Alam, William Farrell, Marianne Hatzopoulou, Naveen Eluru

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsGreenhouse gasEnvironmental scienceBoroughMesoscopic physicsTraffic simulationTransport engineeringIntersection (aeronautics)EngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper demonstrates the implementation of a traffic simulation linked with instantaneous emissions modelling and is used to evaluate the effects of street closures and area-wide pedestrianization on vehicle-induced greenhouse gas emissions. The study is set in Montreal, Canada where traffic in a dense borough (8656 links) is simulated in a dynamic traffic assignment mode to generate second-by-second speed profiles along every link in the 7–8 AM period. Instantaneous speeds are then used to estimate link-level and intersection-level emissions. The traffic demand at the borough boundaries is simulated using a mesoscopic traffic assignment model developed for the Montreal metropolitan region (127 217 links). Street closures and area-wide pedestrianization schemes are modelled within the microscopic as well as the mesoscopic models to evaluate their effects on greenhouse gas emissions, both while accounting for changes in demand and under constant demand. In all cases, we observe an increase in borough-level greenhouse gas emissions compared to the base-case scenario indicating that such schemes do not lead to a reduction in emissions even when accounting for changes in demand. We also compare emissions calculated using the microscopic models (traffic and emissions) and those obtained from the mesoscopic assignment (traffic and average-speed emissions) and observe that the regional model is much less sensitive to local-level changes mostly due to the incapacity of simulating accelerations and decelerations and therefore underestimating the changes in borough-level emissions compared to the base-case scenario. This indicates the importance of adopting instantaneous emissions models for the evaluation of changes to street configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2014
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicVehicle emissions and performanceFrench-language works237,207