MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140517303 · doi:10.1109/sma.1997.634880

Towards a generic editor for subdivision surfaces

2002· article· en· W2140517303 on OpenAlexaff
Haroon S. Sheikh, Rhenan Bartels

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooCentre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubdivisionSubdivision surfacePolygon meshComputer scienceSurface (topology)SmoothnessProcess (computing)Theoretical computer scienceAlgorithmComputer graphics (images)Computational scienceMathematicsProgramming languageGeometryEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subdivision surfaces are defined by a mesh of points and by one or more refinement rules that substitute new, larger subsets of points for existing subsets to yield refined meshes. The refinement rules defining a subdivision surface are known collectively as the refinement process defining the surface. Refinement processes of interest are any for which the successively refined meshes can be shown to converge to a subdivision surface with known smoothness properties. The authors report on the progress of their investigations into software abstractions for refinement, providing for a generic editor to be implemented that can assist in the design of any subdivision surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207