MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140526691 · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2003.820595

Design of a Novel Knowledge-Based Fault Detection and Isolation Scheme

2004· article· en· W2140526691 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault detection and isolationArtificial neural networkCluster analysisComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Fault (geology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Matching (statistics)WaveletData miningReal-time computingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a real-time fault detection and isolation (FDI) scheme for dynamical systems is developed, by integrating the signal processing technique with neural network design. Wavelet analysis is applied to capture the fault-induced transients of the measured signals in real-time, and the decomposed signals are pre-processed to extract details about a fault. A Regional Self-Organizing feature Map (R-SOM) neural network is synthesized to classify the fault types. The R-SOM neural network adopts two regions adjustment in the learning algorithm, thus it has high precision in clustering and matching, especially when the noise, disturbance and other uncertainties exist in the systems. As a result, the proposed FDI scheme is robust and accurate. The design is implemented on a stirred tank system and satisfactory online testing results are obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it