MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140526691 · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2003.820595

Design of a Novel Knowledge-Based Fault Detection and Isolation Scheme

2004· article· en· W2140526691 on OpenAlexaff
Qing Zhao, Z. Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault detection and isolationArtificial neural networkCluster analysisComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Fault (geology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Matching (statistics)WaveletData miningReal-time computingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a real-time fault detection and isolation (FDI) scheme for dynamical systems is developed, by integrating the signal processing technique with neural network design. Wavelet analysis is applied to capture the fault-induced transients of the measured signals in real-time, and the decomposed signals are pre-processed to extract details about a fault. A Regional Self-Organizing feature Map (R-SOM) neural network is synthesized to classify the fault types. The R-SOM neural network adopts two regions adjustment in the learning algorithm, thus it has high precision in clustering and matching, especially when the noise, disturbance and other uncertainties exist in the systems. As a result, the proposed FDI scheme is robust and accurate. The design is implemented on a stirred tank system and satisfactory online testing results are obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics)Same topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207