Therapeutic potential of the intestinotropic hormone, glucagon-like peptide-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) is a newly discovered growth factor that has been demonstrated to enhance intestinal growth and function in normal rodents and to prevent damage and facilitate intestinal repair in various animal models of intestinal insufficiency. A recent study has demonstrated that GLP-2 also acts as an intestinotropin in humans with short-bowel syndrome. The high degree of specificity of GLP-2 for induction of intestinal growth, without affecting growth of other peripheral tissues, is determined by the highly localized expression of the GLP-2 receptor in the intestinal epithelium. In this article, we review the regulation of GLP-2 in physiology, from synthesis to metabolism, with a particular emphasis on potential targets in this pathway for therapeutic manipulation of GLP-2 actions. We also discuss the various animal models of intestinal insufficiency that have been used to demonstrate the therapeutic potential of this intestinotropic hormone, including short bowel, intestinal atrophy, enteritis and colitis. The results of these studies indicate that GLP-2 is a promising therapeutic agent for the treatment of various forms of intestinal insufficiency in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".