Certains paysages d’Herzog sous la loupe du système des attractions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte présente un parcours de l'évolution du concept d'attraction dans les théories du cinéma. Les lectures qu'en font Eisenstein et Gunning permettent à l'auteur de faire un parallèle avec un autre concept, celui de défamiliarisation. À la lumière de cette mise au point, il devient possible d'établir que la manière dont Herzog utilise les paysages dans des films comme Fata Morgana (1968-1970) et Aguirre, la colère de Dieu (1972) s'inscrit parfaitement dans la préoccupation d'une communication directe comme celle qui entoure le concept d'attraction. L'idée de sublime s'insère dans ce parcours pour souligner le caractère fortement émotif sur lequel jouent les représentations de paysages chez Herzog.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it