MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140644941 · doi:10.1109/ngi.2010.5534467

Optimal allocation approach of virtual servers in cloud computing

2010· article· en· W2140644941 on OpenAlexaff
K. Bouyoucef, I. Limam-Bedhiaf, Omar Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServerData centerComputer scienceWorkloadCloud computingVirtual machineLinear programmingDistributed computingComputer networkOperating systemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper an optimal allocation approach of virtual servers to appropriate data centers is proposed for a network made up of collections of data centers and user groups. The virtual server allocation can be formalized as a linear programming (LP) problem which consists in minimizing the round-trip-times (latencies) between data centers and user groups. Our proposed allocation approach demonstrated good capabilities when evaluated under round-trip-time and group requirements (workload) changes. In compliance with the numerical results that are obtained using our proposed allocation approach, we observed that as long as the data center saturation is not achieved, increases in group requirements results in increases in the data center utilization percentage while the optimum doesn't change. However, when approaching the data center saturation our proposed approach ineluctably switches to another optimum resulting in a new reallocation of virtual servers. In contrast, by now varying round-trip-times between user groups and data centers neither data center utilization nor virtual server migration vary as long as the optimum remains unchanged. Nevertheless, beyond certain values of round-triptimes this optimum may obviously change inducing a virtual server re-allocation and variations in the data center utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207