MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140651578 · doi:10.5603/cj.2013.0155

The long and winding road

2013· editorial· en· W2140651578 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Journal · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineDemographyHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We chose the title “The long and winding boad”, a beautiful song from “The Beatles ” [1] for many different reasons. First, the road that the Cardiology Journal took in the last years to arrive at the current stage was a long road, often winding (sometimes not easy to walk it!), and we are tra-veling on this interesting journey. Second, “The Beatles ” are one of the international/universal rock bands that reflect on how the world became smaller. We can all relate to and enjoy their music, and even when the meaning of their songs would be different for different people around the world, the joy persists. This was the vision of our predecessors that decided to take Cardiology Journal to an interna-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it