La résolution de conflits familiaux chez les Canadiennes musulmanes à Montréal : un système de justice parallèle?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente, à partir de données tirées d’entrevues menées lors d’une recherche qualitative entreprise à Montréal (2005-2007), les différents modes alternatifs de résolution de conflit, leurs acteurs et processus, sollicités par les Canadiennes musulmanes vivant des conflits familiaux. L’analyse des discours de ces acteurs et des Canadiennes musulmanes nous a amené à conclure qu’il n’y a pas, à Montréal, de système juridique musulman, informel et organisé qui existerait en parallèle au système judiciaire étatique. Nous avons plutôt découvert l’existence de différents processus au coeur desquels on retrouve le conseiller religieux. Dans ces processus, ce sont davantage son rôle de conseil, la négociation et le consentement du couple ainsi que leur bonne volonté qui sont mis en exergue, qu’un quelconque pouvoir de trancher un litige du conseiller.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".