SNR Estimation Over SIMO Channels From Linearly Modulated Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of data-aided (DA) and nondata-aided (NDA) per-antenna signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) estimation over wireless single-input multiple-output (SIMO) channels from linearly modulated signals. Under constant channels and additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), we first derive the DA maximum-likelihood (ML) SNR estimator in closed-form expression. The performance of the DA ML estimator is analytically carried out by deriving the closed-form expression of its bias and variance. Besides, in order to compare its performance with the fundamental limit, we derive the DA Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) in closed-form expression. In the NDA case, the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is derived to iteratively maximize the log-likelihood function. The performance of the NDA ML estimator is empirically assessed using Monte Carlo simulations. Moreover, we introduce an efficient algorithm, which applies to any one/two-dimensionalM-ary constellation, to numerically compute the NDA CRLBs. In this paper, the noise components are assumed to be spatially uncorrelated over all the antenna elements and temporally white. In both cases, we show that our new inphase and quadrature I/Q-based estimators offer substantial performance improvements over the single-input single-output (SISO) ML SNR estimator due to the optimal usage of the statistical dependence between the antenna branches, and that it reaches the corresponding CRLB over a wide SNR range. We also show that the use of the I/Q-based ML estimators can lead to remarkable performance improvements over the moment-based estimators for the same antenna-array size. Moreover, it is shown that SIMO configurations can contribute to decreasing the required number of iterations of the EM algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".