MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140686382 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v3n1p108

Strategies for Controlling and Monitoring Water Quality in the Central African Water Distribution Company (SODECA)

2011· article· en· W2140686382 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alafei Nama Janice Sandrine, Jun Hong, Yves Yalanga

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryReagentControl (management)Quality (philosophy)Water supplyWater qualityDistribution (mathematics)WorkforceProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringEcologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study investigated the strategies for controlling and monitoring water quality in the Central AfricanWater Distribution Company. Several important monitoring measurements were done to ascertain the water qualityat different stages of the production line, such as physico-chemical, limnology and bacteriological. According to theresults, sometimes the frequency of controls undergoes a modification in time. This justifies the reduction of thenumber of controls. The breaking-off the reagent causes also a reduction of the number of analyses. The frequencyof physicochemical control is much more respected compared to the bacteriological and limnologic controls.Therefore, it is recommended to have laboratory equipment with high technical instrument, and highly trained workforce; the regular supply of reagents used in analyses of quality control; the revision of method, mode of analyses ofcontrol, monitoring and distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207