MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140703689 · doi:10.1109/have.2008.4685296

A scalable adaptive time synchronization protocol for Large Scale Distributed Collaborative Simulation Environment

2008· article· en· W2140703689 on OpenAlexaff
Lotfi Ahmad, Ming Zhang, A. Boukerche

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityComputer scienceDistributed computingSynchronization (alternating current)ArchitecturePeer-to-peerConsistency (knowledge bases)Fault toleranceImplementationComputer networkArtificial intelligenceSoftware engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the emergence of massive multiplayer online games (MMOG) and distributed distant learning/e-learning applications, distributed virtual environments (DVE) have received a good deal of attention. As a highly human-computer interacting environment, DVE provides an ideal platform for real-time message exchanges among virtual objects, human-beings. However, consistency and scalability are becoming indispensable challenges considering the complexities of the existing heterogeneous network architecture as well as the state synchronization requirement of DVEs. In this paper, we made an effort to address these issues by proposing a novel JXTA-based overlay peer to peer architecture for large scale distributed collaborative virtual simulation environments. Compared with our previous implementations based on Department of Defense (DoDpsilas) High Level Architecture (HLA/RTI), this novel architecture is able to provide consistency, scalability and fault tolerance by taking advantages of state-of-the-art of the peer to peer computing paradigm. Our experimental results show that the scalability of DVEs is improved significantly whit our Peer-to-Peer DVE architecture. As a step further, we also propose a time and state synchronization algorithm and evaluate its performance using a series of simulation experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207