MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140703874 · doi:10.1111/ppl.12341

Soybean seeds overexpressing asparaginase exhibit reduced nitrogen concentration

2015· article· en· W2140703874 on OpenAlexafffund
Sudhakar Pandurangan, Agnieszka Pająk, Tara L. Rintoul, Cinta Hernández‐Sebastià, Daniel C. Brown, Frédéric Marsolais

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiologia Plantarum · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern University
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsAsparagineAsparaginaseTransgeneAsparagine synthetaseAspartic acidEnzymeEnzyme assayBiochemistryEmbryoNitrogenProtein subunitChemistryComplementary DNAPhaseolusAmino acidGlobulinBiologyMolecular biologyBotanyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

-dependent asparaginase cDNA, PvAspG2, was expressed in transgenic soybean under the control of the embryo specific promoter of the β-subunit of β-conglycinin. Three lines were isolated having high expression of the transgene at the transcript, protein and enzyme activity levels at mid-maturation, with a 20- to 40-fold higher asparaginase activity in embryo than a control line expressing β-glucuronidase. Increased asparaginase activity was associated with a reduction in free asparagine levels as a percentage of total free amino acids, by 11-18%, and an increase in free aspartic acid levels, by 25-60%. Two of the lines had reduced nitrogen concentration in mature seed as determined by nitrogen analysis, by 9-13%. Their levels of extractible globulins were reduced by 11-30%. This was accompanied by an increase in oil concentration, by 5-8%. The lack of change in nitrogen concentration in the third transgenic line was correlated with an increase in free glutamic acid levels by approximately 40% at mid-maturation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologia PlantarumSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207