A Proof-of-Concept Demonstration of Visual Teach and Repeat on a Quadrocopter Using an Altitude Sensor and a Monocular Camera
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper applies an existing vision-based navigation algorithm to a micro aerial vehicle (MAV). The algorithm has previously been used for long-range navigation of ground robots based on on-board 3D vision sensors such as a stereo or Kinect cameras. A teach-and-repeat operational strategy enables a robot to autonomously repeat a manually taught route without relying on an external positioning system such as GPS. For MAVs we show that a monocular downward looking camera combined with an altitude sensor can be used as 3D vision sensor replacing other resource-expensive 3D vision solutions. The paper also includes a simple path tracking controller that uses feedback from the visual and inertial sensors to guide the vehicle along a straight and level path. Preliminary experimental results demonstrate reliable, accurate and fully autonomous flight of an 8-m-long (straight and level) route, which was taught with the quadrocopter fixed to a cart. Finally, we present the successful flight of a more complex, 16-m-long route.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it