Cardiopulmonary exercise performance in adult survivors of the Mustard procedure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most patients with the Mustard procedure are now adults. To date, however, there have been few reports on resting and exercise hemodynamics in a large population of adults with this circulation. The aim of this study is to describe such parameters in one of the largest and oldest populations of adults with the Mustard procedure. The database of the University of Toronto Congenital Cardiac Centre for Adults was examined to identify 84 adults with the Mustard procedure who have undergone cardiopulmonary exercise tests. Magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography studies were obtained in order to assess right ventricular size, function and baseline hemodynamics. Patients achieved lower maximum uptake of oxygen, maximal heart rate, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and oxygen saturations at maximal exercise compared to a healthy population. Magnetic resonance imaging showed significantly different right ventricular ejection fractions between patients and controls. There were no effects of operative variables or preoperative hemodynamics on current exercise capacity. Patients after the Mustard procedure have subnormal exercise capacities. Factors such as chronotropic incompetence, peripheral deconditioning, and impaired lung function may be responsible for these results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".