Quality assessment of microseismic event locations and traveltime picks using a multiplet analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proliferation of hydraulic fracturing (frac) stimulation and other enhanced oil recovery techniques in unconventional plays has spurred interest in microseismic monitoring. Changes in stress in the subsurface produced by hydrocarbon production may induce brittle failure events. Many enhanced oil recovery techniques such as hydraulic frac stimulation or cyclic steam stimulation involve injecting large volumes of fluid at high pressure into a reservoir. Microseismic events, hereafter events, may illuminate the reach and effectiveness of enhanced recovery techniques within a reservoir. When array configuration is favorable, advanced analysis of microseismic data may provide additional information. For instance, seismic moment tensor inversion (Eaton and Forouhideh, 2010) may estimate the failure mode of an event. The aforementioned failure modes may include fracture-opening, shear, or fracture-closing events. Knowledge of the failure modes allows a detailed analysis of the effects of changing parameters such as steam injection temperature or well spacing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".