MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140768127 · doi:10.1002/dvg.20386

Temporally controlled prostate epithelium‐specific gene alterations

2008· article· en· W2140768127 on OpenAlexaff
H. Artee Luchman, Hana Friedman, Michelle L. Villemaire, Alan C. Peterson, Frank R. Jirik

Bibliographic record

Venuegenesis · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria HospitalAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCre recombinaseBiologyProstateProstate cancerFusion geneCarcinogenesisGeneCancer researchTransgeneEpitheliumGene targetingGenetically modified mouseGeneticsCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employing the Hprt locus as the site for targeted transgenesis we have developed mice expressing the tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ER(T2) fusion protein under the control of the ARR2-rat probasin promoter. This system enables external control over the timing of prostate epithelial cell-specific gene alterations. Using both the ROSA26-lacZ and ROSA26-EYFP reporter strains to monitor recombinase activity, Cre-ER(T2) was found to be specifically expressed in the prostatic epithelium and was strictly tamoxifen dependent. This strain thus allows precise control over the timing of gene alterations in the mouse prostate, enabling analyses of the phenotypic consequences of gene alterations in mice of any age. It also provides an ideal platform to study the impact of environmental, hormonal, and age-related factors on prostate tumorigenesis. This latter feature will be of particular value given the paucity of murine models that accurately mimic the late onset and prolonged natural history of human prostate cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuegenesisSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207