MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140783883 · doi:10.7202/014564ar

Le point de vue des aidants familiaux sur les services en santé mentale offerts à leurs proches

2007· article· fr· W2140783883 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Michel Perreault, Hélène Provencher, Myreille St‐Onge, Michel Rousseau

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté mentale au Québec · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas CollegeUniversité Laval
FundersMinistère de la SantéMinistère de la Santé et des Services sociaux
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présente étude a été menée auprès de 40 aidants familiaux membres d'associations de soutien aux familles et amis de personnes souffrant de maladie mentale. Ces aidants ont été rencontrés individuellement afin de documenter leur opinion sur les services en santé mentale offerts à leur proche. L'analyse de leurs commentaires témoigne à la fois de l'expression de satisfaction et d'insatisfaction au sujet de l'organisation des services par la quasi-totalité des participants. Toutefois, la question de l'organisation des services, plus spécifiquement en rapport avec leur accessibilité, entraîne le plus grand nombre de commentaires d'insatisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté mentale au QuébecSame topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207