Immunolocalization of ectonucleotidases along the rat nephron
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Evidence is accumulating that extracellular nucleotides act as autocrine/paracrine agents in most tissues, including the kidneys. Several families of surface-located enzymes, collectively known as ectonucleotidases, can degrade nucleotides. Using immunohistochemistry, we have examined the segmental distribution of five ectonucleotidases along the rat nephron. Perfusion-fixed kidneys were obtained from anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats. Cryostat sections of cortical and medullary regions were incubated with antibodies specific to the following enzymes: ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase (NTPDase) 1, NTPDase2, NTPDase3, ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase phosphodiesterase 3 (NPP3), and ecto-5'-nucleotidase. Sections were then costained with Phaseolus vulgaris erythroagglutinin (for identification of proximal tubules) and antibodies against Tamm-Horsfall protein (for identification of thick ascending limb), calbindin-D(28k) (for identification of distal tubule), and aquaporin-2 (for identification of collecting duct). The tyramide signal amplification method was used when the ectonucleotidase and marker antibody were raised in the same species. The glomerulus expressed NTPDase1 and NPP3. The proximal tubule showed prominent expression of NPP3 and ecto-5'-nucleotidase in most, but not all, segments. NTPDase2 and NTPDase3, but not NPP3 or ecto-5'-nucleotidase, were expressed in the thick ascending limb and distal tubule. NTPDase3, with some low-level expression of ecto-5'-nucleotidase, was also found in cortical and outer medullary collecting ducts. Inner medullary collecting ducts displayed low-level staining for NTPDase1, NTPDase2, NTPDase3, and ecto-5'-nucleotidase. We conclude that these ectonucleotidases are differentially expressed along the nephron and may play a key role in activation of purinoceptors by nucleotides and nucleosides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".