MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140810580 · doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjp036

Sensorium: The Original Raison D'etre of the Motile Cilium?

2009· article· fr· W2140810580 on OpenAlexaff
Lynne M. Quarmby, Michel R. Leroux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Cell Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCiliumMotile ciliumBiologySensory systemFunction (biology)Intraflagellar transportCell biologyNeuroscienceFlagellumGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of non-motile (primary) cilia as sensory antennae critical for metazoan development and physiology has surfaced over the last decade, long after the function of motile cilia in propelling cells or moving fluids across tissues was well established. A new study of motile cilia from respiratory airways raises the possibility that transducing sensory cues from the environment is a universal characteristic of cilia and may have been the original raison d'être of the ancestral cilium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molecular Cell BiologySame topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207