MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140811101 · doi:10.1002/sec.1082

ReDD: recommendation‐based data dissemination in privacy‐preserving mobile social networks

2014· article· en· W2140811101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSecurity and Communication Networks · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDisseminationComputer securityNetwork packetAuthentication (law)Internet privacyComputer networkProtocol (science)Social network (sociolinguistics)ConfidentialityQuality (philosophy)Mobile phoneWorld Wide WebSocial mediaTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mobile social network (MSN), which is built upon popular smart phone devices and enables mobile users with similar interests to connect with one another, has received considerable attention in recent years. A common phenomenon that makes the MSN vivid today is mobile users often like to share attractive things to their friends in MSN. In this paper, based on this common phenomenon, we propose an efficient recommendation‐based data dissemination (ReDD) protocol for MSN, which can efficiently disseminate high‐quality messages in a privacy‐preserving way. Specifically, in the proposed ReDD protocol, each mobile user, based on both his or her own view and his or her friends' recommendations, will form his or her personal estimation on the quality of a message. Only if the estimation of quality reaches a threshold, the message will be disseminated. In this way, high‐quality messages can be widely spread in the network and occupy more network resources than low‐quality ones. In order to check the validity of friends' recommendations, ReDD also employs an efficient anonymous authentication technique, which ensures that only the friends of a user can verify recommendations made by the user. Detailed security analysis demonstrates that ReDD can effectively resist various attacks launched by attackers and ensure identity privacy of nodes, confidentiality of shared keys and integrity of data packets. In addition, extensive simulations are also conducted to evaluate the performance of ReDD in terms of the number of active nodes and the average active time, and the simulation results show that high‐quality messages can be disseminated widely and efficiently, while low‐quality ones will be eliminated shortly to avoid occupying network resources. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it