A new pressure drop model for flow‐through orifice plates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study was carried out to seek a suitable model to describe flow through orifices. The model of developing flow through short ducts was found to be adequate. There were two free parameters in the model equation involving the normalized pressure drop and Reynolds number. Experiments were performed using two Plexiglas tanks separated by an orifice. The liquid level height variation with time was recorded. A unique parametric estimation technique was used to determine the two free parameters from the dynamic liquid level data. It was found that direct use of the experimental data (liquid level heights) is the best option in correlating the experimental data with the model. The correlation fits well with the present and literature experimental data quite well. It was found that the variation of the pressure drop with the flow rate is linear when the flow is weak, where the orifice Reynolds number is less 10. When the flow is strong, the ratio of the pressure drop to the flow rate becomes linearly related to the flow rate. These two limits are identical to those for flow in porous media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it