MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140826318 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2009.5425510

A Relaxed Half-Stochastic Iterative Decoder for LDPC Codes

2009· article· en· W2140826318 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeDecoding methodsAlgorithmComputer scienceBinary numberNode (physics)Representation (politics)Relaxation (psychology)Belief propagationCode (set theory)Theoretical computer scienceMathematicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a Relaxed Half-Stochastic (RHS) low-density parity-check (LDPC) decoding algorithm that uses some elements of the sum-product algorithm (SPA) in its variable nodes, but maintains the low-complexity interleaver and check node structures characteristic of stochastic decoders. The algorithm relies on the principle of successive relaxation to convert binary stochastic streams to a log-likelihood ratio (LLR) representation. Simulations of a (2048, 1723) RS-LDPC code show that the RHS algorithm can outperform 100-iterations floating-point SPA decoding. We describe approaches for low-complexity implementation of the RHS algorithm. Furthermore, we show how the stochastic nature of the belief representation can be exploited to lower the error floor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207