MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140841129 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2002.802224

Optical OOK-CDMA and PPM-CDMA systems with turbo product codes

2002· article· en· W2140841129 on OpenAlexfundno aff
C. Argon, Stephen McLaughlin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPartenariat Canadien Contre Le CancerOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiTexas A and M University
KeywordsTurbo codeCode division multiple accessElectronic engineeringPulse-position modulationComputer scienceBit error rateOn-off keyingTurboDecoding methodsTelecommunicationsPhase-shift keyingEngineeringDetectorPulse-amplitude modulationPulse (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The application of turbo product codes (TPC) in intensity-modulated direct-detection optical code-division multiple-access (CDMA) systems with ON-OFF keying or binary pulse-position modulation is proposed in this study. Optical multiple-access interference caused by other users is the main source of noise that degrades system performance and limits the total number of active users in an optical CDMA system. In this work, the original turbo product decoding algorithm is modified according to the binary memoryless channel model. It is shown that the implementation of TPCs in an optical CDMA system provides significant improvement of the bit-error rate, hence, permitting a higher number of active users with optical orthogonal codes (OOC) of less weight. The proposed TPC has about 20% overhead, but the reduction in the weight of the OOC reduces the system bandwidth to less than half to that of the comparable uncoded system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207