The amino-terminal non-catalytic region of Salmonella typhimurium SigD affects actin organization in yeast and mammalian cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The internalization of Salmonella into epithelial cells relies on the function of bacterial proteins which are injected into the cell by a specialized type III secretion system. Such bacterial effectors interfere with host cell signalling and induce local cytoskeletal rearrangements. One of such effectors is SigD/SopB, which shares homology with mammalian inositol phosphatases. We made use of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model for elucidating new aspects of SigD function. Endogenous expression of SigD in yeast caused severe growth inhibition. Surprisingly, sigD alleles mutated in the catalytic site or even deleted for the whole C-terminal phosphatase domain still inhibited yeast growth by inducing loss of actin polarization and precluding the budding process. Accordingly, when expressed in HeLa cells, the same sigD alleles lost the ability of depleting phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate from the plasma membrane, but still caused disappearance of actin fibres and loss of adherence. We delineate a region of 25 amino acids (residues 118-142) that is necessary for the effect of SigD on actin in HeLa cells. Our data indicate that SigD exerts a toxic effect linked to its N-terminal region and independent of its phosphatase activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it