MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140935112 · doi:10.7202/022452ar

Les mécanismes de production de la forme urbaine et la conservation des espaces agricoles et naturels dans la région de Montréal : le cas de Laval

2005· article· fr· W2140935112 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Ecology and Soil Science
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'article s'intéresse aux mécanismes de production de la forme urbaine dans la région de Montréal. Il fait mention des nombreuses réflexions menées depuis plus de 30 ans au sujet de la forme de l'agglomération et de l'étalement urbain. Plus spécifiquement, la problématique des espaces naturels, verts et libres est posée vis-à-vis la planification urbaine et les pressions d'urbanisation. L'évolution de l'utilisation du sol à Laval met en perspective les processus d'urbanisation, qui sont la déstructuration du domaine agricole et des bois, par le morcellement et la constitution de friches, suivis de la planification des espaces libres. La conclusion situe Laval dans la dynamique métropolitaine, en évaluant les mouvements d'expansion urbaine et des politiques de conservation des espaces agricoles et naturels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it