Les mécanismes de production de la forme urbaine et la conservation des espaces agricoles et naturels dans la région de Montréal : le cas de Laval
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'article s'intéresse aux mécanismes de production de la forme urbaine dans la région de Montréal. Il fait mention des nombreuses réflexions menées depuis plus de 30 ans au sujet de la forme de l'agglomération et de l'étalement urbain. Plus spécifiquement, la problématique des espaces naturels, verts et libres est posée vis-à-vis la planification urbaine et les pressions d'urbanisation. L'évolution de l'utilisation du sol à Laval met en perspective les processus d'urbanisation, qui sont la déstructuration du domaine agricole et des bois, par le morcellement et la constitution de friches, suivis de la planification des espaces libres. La conclusion situe Laval dans la dynamique métropolitaine, en évaluant les mouvements d'expansion urbaine et des politiques de conservation des espaces agricoles et naturels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".