MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140943316 · doi:10.1109/inm.2015.7140343

URL forwarding for NAT traversal

2015· article· en· W2140943316 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Ahsan Raza, Reaz Ahmed, Raouf Boutaba

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNAT traversalComputer scienceUsabilityComputer networkThe InternetTree traversalArchitectureResidential gatewaySet (abstract data type)Protocol (science)Internet accessNetwork address translationWorld Wide WebInternet ProtocolOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapid technological advancement has induced widespread adoption of smart, powerful and multi-purpose enduser devices (e.g., phones, tablets, set-top boxes, gaming console etc.) in our daily life. Unfortunately, the available mechanisms for accessing, configuring and controlling these devices are still primitive, and require physical access to the devices. Enabling remote access to these devices through a widely used protocol, such as HTTP, can significantly improve their usability and can foster innovative applications. However, the end-devices are often NATed by home gateways, which is not suitable for HTTP access over the Internet. In this work, we present a mechanism for seamless traversal of HTTP traffic through home gateways. Our approach builds upon the existing Web-technology. It allows remote access using global DNS names, despite the end-devices having local IPs. As a proof of concept, we realize the proposed architecture on the well-accepted OpenWRT platform, and report experimental results on device access performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207