MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140947081 · doi:10.1029/2000je001355

Utopia Basin, Mars: Characterization of topography and morphology and assessment of the origin and evolution of basin internal structure

2001· article· en· W2140947081 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinNoachianTectonicsMars Exploration ProgramPaleontologyRidgeImpact craterGeomorphologyMartianAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently obtained Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) topography has permitted a new assessment of the morphology, structure, and history of Utopia Planitia. The new topographic data convincingly demonstrate that the Utopia region is an impact basin, as originally proposed by McGill [1989], whose major topographic expression is a circular, 1–3 km deep depression ∼3200 km in diameter. Utopia Basin is the largest easily recognizable impact structure in the northern hemisphere of Mars and is the only portion of the northern lowlands that exhibits a distinct large‐scale impact signature; its presence there and its ancient age verify that a significant part of the northern lowlands dates back to the Noachian period. Using slope maps derived from gridded topography, we have mapped a series of linear slope anomalies within the basin and have analyzed their origin. These features can be classified into two groups: one oriented dominantly radial to the basin and the other oriented dominantly circumferential. The circumferential features are tens of kilometers wide and hundreds of kilometers long and appear to remain relatively constant with respect to elevation. We explore end‐member hypotheses (1) that the features formed by the direct action of water/ice or (2) that they are tectonic wrinkle ridges. We interpret the majority of these features to be due to tectonic deformation (primarily wrinkle‐ridge formation), modified by later sedimentation associated with the emplacement of the outflow channels and the formation of the Vastitas Borealis Formation. On the basis of the characteristics of these features and their association with polygonal terrain, thumbprint terrain, smoothness of units, and evidence of sedimentary deposits, we find that our results support earlier hypotheses proposing that a significant volume of water occupied Utopia Basin during the late Hesperian period of outflow channel formation. Utopia Basin differs significantly in depth and degradation state from the deeper and fresher‐appearing Hellas Basin, although the two are both Noachian in age. A significant part of this difference seems reasonably interpreted to be the result of the extensive sedimentary and volcanic infilling history of the northern lowlands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it