Circadian clock genes <i>frequency</i> and <i>white collar-1</i> are not essential for entrainment to temperature cycles in <i>Neurospora crassa</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fungus Neurospora crassa is a model system for investigating the mechanism of circadian rhythmicity, and the core of its circadian oscillator is thought to be a transcription/translation feedback loop involving the products of the frq (frequency), wc-1 (white-collar-1) and wc-2 (white-collar-2) genes. Several reports of rhythmicity in frq and wc null mutants have raised questions about how central the FRQ/WC loop is to the circadian system of Neurospora. Several research groups have attempted to answer this question by looking for entrainment of the conidiation banding rhythm in frq null mutants. Because the frq mutants are blind to light and cannot be entrained to light/dark cycles, these groups have used symmetric temperature cycles of equal-duration cool and warm phases to entrain the rhythm. Under these conditions, the direct effects of temperature on conidiation (masking effects) can compromise observations of the endogenous rhythm. I have reexamined this question by using short heat pulses to clearly separate masking from endogenous rhythms, and I have assayed entrainment in both frq and wc-1 null mutants. I found similar patterns of entrainment in the wild type and both mutant strains. Strong masking effects were found in the frq mutant but not in the wc-1 mutant. I conclude that a rapidly damping temperature-entrainable oscillator is present in the null mutants. A single temperature-entrainable oscillator may drive the conidiation rhythm in all strains, and additional properties such as light sensitivity and temperature compensation may be conferred by the intact FRQ/WC loop in the WT strain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".