MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141034406 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.1993.714345

A fuzzy genetic algorithm with effective search and optimization

2005· article· en· W2141034406 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTravelling salesman problemQuality control and genetic algorithmsComputer scienceGenetic algorithmFuzzy logicSelection (genetic algorithm)Fuzzy control systemArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMeta-optimizationMathematical optimizationMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fuzzy genetic algorithm (FGA) is created by systematically integrating fuzzy expert systems (FESs) with genetic algorithms in this paper, with the goal of this integration being the synergism of their advantages and strengths. In the FGA, FESs can model expert knowledge for genetic algorithms on the specific tasks being addressed. They can also assist in initial selection and dynamic online adjustment of the control parameters of the algorithms, resulting in significant improvement in FGA's search and optimization efficiency. Experiments demonstrate that FGAs can search faster and more effectively than standard genetic algorithms in solving the traveling salesman and other optimization problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207