MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141065482 · doi:10.1109/ascc.2013.6606184

Quantized state feedback stabilization with signal-to-noise ratio constraints

2013· article· en· W2141065482 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu Feng, Xiang Chen, Guoxiang Gu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Additive white Gaussian noiseQuantization (signal processing)White noiseLogarithmMathematicsAlgebraic Riccati equationGaussian noiseConstraint (computer-aided design)Noise (video)Linear-quadratic-Gaussian controlChannel (broadcasting)Riccati equationComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematical optimizationOptimal controlDifferential equationControl (management)TelecommunicationsStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the problem of state feedback stabilization for single-input discrete-time systems over a communication channel, where both logarithmic quantization error and white noise are included. The logarithmic quantizer is characterized by a received signal-to-error ratio (R-SER) model and the white noise is modelled by additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel where a signal-to-noise constraint is imposed. The desired control law is aimed to stabilize the system in the presence of quantized error and to satisfy some pre-specified power constraint, simultaneously. A solvability condition is derived in terms of Mahler measure of the plant and the desired feedback controller is obtained through solving an algebraic Riccati equation. An example is included to illustrate the current results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207