Protein Signatures Distinctive of Alpha Proteobacteria and Its Subgroups and a Model for α –Proteobacterial Evolution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alpha (alpha) proteobacteria comprise a large and metabolically diverse group. No biochemical or molecular feature is presently known that can distinguish these bacteria from other groups. The evolutionary relationships among this group, which includes numerous pathogens and agriculturally important microbes, are also not understood. Shared conserved inserts and deletions (i.e., indels or signatures) in molecular sequences provide a powerful means for identification of different groups in clear terms, and for evolutionary studies (see www.bacterialphylogeny.com). This review describes, for the first time, a large number of conserved indels in broadly distributed proteins that are distinctive and unifying characteristics of either all alpha-proteobacteria, or many of its constituent subgroups (i.e., orders, families, etc.). These signatures were identified by systematic analyses of proteins found in the Rickettsia prowazekii (RP) genome. Conserved indels that are unique to alpha-proteobacteria are present in the following proteins: Cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein Ctag, PurC, DnaB, ATP synthase alpha-subunit, exonuclease VII, prolipoprotein phosphatidylglycerol transferase, RP-400, FtsK, puruvate phosphate dikinase, cytochrome b, MutY, and homoserine dehydrogenase. The signatures in succinyl-CoA synthetase, cytochrome oxidase I, alanyl-tRNA synthetase, and MutS proteins are found in all alpha-proteobacteria, except the Rickettsiales, indicating that this group has diverged prior to the introduction of these signatures. A number of proteins contain conserved indels that are specific for Rickettsiales (XerD integrase and leucine aminopeptidase), Rickettsiaceae (Mfd, ribosomal protein L19, FtsZ, Sigma 70 and exonuclease VII), or Anaplasmataceae (Tgt and RP-314), and they distinguish these groups from all others. Signatures in DnaA, RP-057, and DNA ligase A are commonly shared by various Rhizobiales, Rhodobacterales, and Caulobacter, suggesting that these groups shared a common ancestor exclusive of other alpha-proteobacteria. A specific relationship between Rhodobacterales and Caulobacter is indicated by a large insert in the Asn-Gln amidotransferase. The Rhizobiales group of species are distinguished from others by a large insert in the Trp-tRNA synthetase. Signature sequences in a number of other proteins (viz. oxoglutarate dehydogenase, succinyl-CoA synthase, LytB, DNA gyrase A, LepA, and Ser-tRNA synthetase) serve to distinguish the Rhizobiaceae, Brucellaceae, and Phyllobacteriaceae families from Bradyrhizobiaceae and Methylobacteriaceae. Based on the distribution patterns of these signatures, it is now possible to logically deduce a model for the branching order among alpha-proteobacteria, which is as follows: Rickettsiales --> Rhodospirillales-Sphingomonadales --> Rhodobacterales-Caulobacterales --> Rhizobiales (Rhizobiaceaea-Brucellaceae-Phyllobacteriaceae, and Bradyrhizobiaceae). The deduced branching order is also consistent with the topologies in the 16 rRNA and other phylogenetic trees. Signature sequences in a number of other proteins provide evidence that alpha-proteobacteria is a late branching taxa within Bacteria, which branched after the delta,epsilon-subdivisions but prior to the beta,gamma-proteobacteria. The shared presence of many of these signatures in the mitochondrial (eukaryotic) homologs also provides evidence of the alpha-proteobacterial ancestry of mitochondria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it