MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Locally and systemically active glucocorticosteroids modify intestinal absorption of sugars in rats

2003· article· en· W2141088844 on OpenAlexaff
Aducio Thiesen, Gary Wild, M. Keelan, M. T. Clandinin, A. B. R. Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet, Metabolism, and Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFructoseInternal medicineEndocrinologyGlucose transporterBiologyGlucose uptakeSmall intestineWeaningChemistryInsulinBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glucocorticosteroids enhance digestive and absorptive functions of the intestine of weaning and adult rats. This study was undertaken to assess the influence of treatment of weaning male rats with budesonide (Bud), prednisone (Pred), or control vehicle on the in vitro jejunal and ileal uptake of glucose and fructose. Bud and Pred had no effect on the uptake of d-glucose by sodium glucose transporter-1. In contrast, the uptake of d-fructose by GLUT-5 was similarly increased with Bud and with Pred. The increases in the uptake of fructose were not due to variations in the weight of the intestinal mucosa, food intake, or in GLUT-5 protein or mRNA expression. There were no steroid-associated changes in mRNA expression of c-myc, c-jun, c-fos, proglucagon, or selected cytokines. However, the abundance of ileal ornithine decarboxylase mRNA was increased with Pred. Giving postweaning rats 4 wk of Bud or Pred in doses equivalent to those used in clinical practice increases fructose but not glucose uptake. This enhanced uptake of fructose was likely regulated by posttranslational processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207