MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141090792 · doi:10.1109/icc.2011.5963254

Tight Capacity Bounds for Discrete Memoryless Channels with Synchronization Errors, Additive Noise, and Large Alphabets

2011· article· en· W2141090792 on OpenAlexaff
Hugues Mercier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Biological Computing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchronization (alternating current)Channel capacityUpper and lower boundsNoise (video)MathematicsCapacity planningTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsChannel (broadcasting)CombinatoricsTelecommunicationsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the capacity of discrete memoryless channels with synchronization errors and additive noise. We show that with very large alphabets, their capacity can be achieved by i.i.d. input sources, and prove tight lower and upper capacity bounds. An interesting result is that as long as the input sequences are not completely deleted, the capacity of channels with large alphabets corrupted by discrete timing errors is always nonzero even if all the symbols are corrupted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDNA and Biological ComputingFrench-language works237,207