Outlier Detection for Fine-grained Load Balancing in Database Clusters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent industry trends towards reducing the costs of ownership in large data centers emphasize the need for database system techniques for both automatic performance tuning and efficient resource usage. The goal is to host several database applications on a shared server farm, including scheduling multiple applications on the same physical server or even within a single database engine, while meeting each application's service level agreement. Automatic provisioning of database servers to applications and virtualization techniques, such as, live virtual machine migration have been proposed as useful tools to address this problem. In this paper we argue that by allocating entire server-boxes and migrating entire application stacks in cases of server overload, these solutions are too coarse-grained for many overload situations. Hence, they may result in resource usage inefficiency, performance penalties, or both. We introduce an outlier detection algorithm which zooms in to the fine-grained query contexts which are most affected by an environment change and/or where a perceived overload problem is likely to originate from. We show that isolating these query contexts through either memory quota enforcements or fine-grained load balancing across different database replicas of their respective applications allows us to alleviate resource interference in many cases of overload.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".