MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141117954 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2009.5090195

Compound dynamic and static effects from wind turbines on the reception of television signals

2009· article· en· W2141117954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Wave Propagation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPylonWind powerTurbineRotor (electric)SIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceScatteringWind speedEnergy (signal processing)Marine engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineeringAerospace engineeringMeteorologyPhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To meet the clean energy challenges, the wind farms creation is one of the most promising alternatives. The wind project developer must verify whether there would be a risk on the existing broadcast links in the area before moving towards the construction phase. Geometrical wind turbine modeling can help in determining the scattering of the signal around and assess whether the signal reception in the vicinity will be affected. From ITU Recommendation 69-1/6, we establish a clear propagation methodology to determine the dynamic scattering from the rotor blades and the static scattering from the large pylon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Wave Propagation StudiesFrench-language works237,207