MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141121783 · doi:10.3917/nrp.012.0185

Identité professionnelle dans l'institution et affiliation sociale en milieu ouvert

2011· article· fr· W2141121783 on OpenAlex
Jean-Luc Prades, Michel Parazelli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelle revue de psychosociologie · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé La sociopsychanalyse institutionnelle, en tant que pratique d’intervention psychosociologique, matérialisée par un dispositif institutionnel (appelé dim : dispositif institutionnel Mendel), a beaucoup évolué depuis une quarantaine d’années qu’elle existe. Elle a diversifié son approche (en se rapprochant des pratiques de supervision « à la manière de Balint », par exemple) et s’est adaptée au milieu ouvert. C’est à partir d’interventions réalisées par l’ adrap (dans le sud de la France) au sein d’une association employant des éducateurs spécialisés travaillant dans des quartiers populaires et par le Collectif DéSisyphe auprès de jeunes de la rue (à Montréal) que sera montrée la nécessité de cet aménagement du dispositif en fonction des personnes et du contexte auxquels il s’applique dans le respect des logiques qui le sous-tendent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.233
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it