MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141124534 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.1995.495548

Doubly apodized SAW filters

2002· article· en· W2141124534 on OpenAlexaff
T. Motsoela, Peter Smith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApodizationPassbandTransducerAcousticsSurface acoustic waveFilter (signal processing)DiffractionMaterials scienceMatched filterBand-pass filterOpticsComputer sciencePhysicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of a surface acoustic wave filter having two apodized in-line transducers is presented. The positions and weights of the taps in both transducers are obtained simultaneously by considering the finger-by-finger interaction between the two transducers. Two design optimization criteria are compared. A device consisting of two 21-tap transducers with a 10 MHz passband centred at 50 MHz is built on 128/spl deg/ rotated Y-cut LiNbO/sub 3/ to verify the design. We show that the sidelobe suppression is limited by diffraction, which was not included in the design procedure. The response is compared to that obtained by a singly-apodized SAW filter of comparable length designed with the Remez exchange algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207