Mens sana ad corpus sanum : Un modèle de motivation-stress-santé appliqué au couple et au travail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'article prend position au sujet du vieil adage: « un esprit sain dans un corps sain ». Des recherches empiriques démontrent qu'avoir un "corps sain dans un esprit sain" est tout aussi important. L'accumulation d'évidences empiriques souligne l'impact des stresseurs psychosociaux sur les affects négatifs et sur la santé mentale de même que leurs répercussions sur la santé physique. En plus, le construit de la motivation et les besoins innés d'autodétermination, de compétence et d'attachement jouent un rôle crucial dans la compréhension des antécédents et des conséquences du stress psychologique, ainsi que du bien-être et de la santé. Un nouveau modèle théorique, bilan de plus de dix ans de travaux théoriques, méthodologiques et empiriques, est appliqué à deux domaines de vie importants : la relation de couple et le travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".