Follow-up study of dogs and cats with asymptomatic<i>Cryptococcus gattii</i>infection or nasal colonization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pathogenesis of Cryptococcus spp. infection following nasal colonization is unclear. This article reports follow-up data on a cohort of seven cats and five dogs identified in a previous study as sub-clinically infected with Cryptococcus spp. or colonized by C. gattii. Two cats progressed to clinical disease within four to six months of initial detection of antigenemia and nasal cavity colonization. The ten other animals remained asymptomatic but many were repeatedly positive on cryptococcal antigen testing or nasal fungal culture suggesting protracted infection or colonization. The results indicate that asymptomatically infected animals may clear the organism, remain sub-clinically infected or progress to clinical disease. Factors influencing the transition from exposure to disease require further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it