MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141290401 · doi:10.1109/iciinfs.2011.6038032

Spectrum sensing in low SNR: Diversity combining and cooperative communications

2011· article· en· W2141290401 on OpenAlexaff
Saman Atapattu, Chintha Tellambura, Hai Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioFalse alarmDetectorComputer scienceFadingMonte Carlo methodSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Cooperative diversityEnergy (signal processing)Maximal-ratio combiningBit error rateDiversity combiningDetection theoryElectronic engineeringStatistical powerAlgorithmConstant false alarm rateTelecommunicationsStatisticsWirelessMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the detection performance of an energy detector used for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks is investigated under very low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels. The analysis focuses on the derivation of closed-form expressions for the false-alarm and the average missed-detection probabilities for two cases over different fading channels: (i) with diversity combining; and (ii) with cooperative communications. The detection threshold is optimized by minimizing the total error rate. The analysis is validated by numerical and semi-analytical Monte-Carlo simulation results, which focus on the sensing requirements defined in IEEE 802.22.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207