MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141301039 · doi:10.1109/rme.2007.4401798

Time-interleaved incremental data converters with low oversampling ratios

2007· article· en· W2141301039 on OpenAlexaff
Trevor Caldwell, D.A. Johns

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOversamplingInterleavingBandwidth (computing)ConvertersComputer scienceElectronic engineeringBoosting (machine learning)SIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incremental ADCs can operate at lower oversampling ratios than DeltaSigma modulators, resulting in higher input signal bandwidths. In this paper it is shown that time-interleaving can further increase the input signal bandwidth in incremental ADCs to the point that the oversampling ratio is equal to the time-interleaving factor, resulting in no decrease in the allowable input signal bandwidth due to oversampling. This paper investigates some of the advantages and challenges that time-interleaved incremental ADCs offer, and presents an example where a time-interleaved by 4 incremental ADC with an oversampling ratio of 4 can attain a resolution of 12 bits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207