Antioxidant activity of tryptic digests of hen egg yolk phosvitin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Food protein-derived peptides with antioxidant activity have great potential for use as natural antioxidants in food products. However, neither the structure-activity relationship nor the antioxidant mechanism of peptides is fully understood. Egg yolk phosvitin has been acknowledged to have strongly antioxidant protein owing to its highly phosphorylated form. In this study the antioxidant activities of tryptic digests of hen egg yolk phosvitin (PPPs), which were prepared by partial dephosphorylation and subsequent hydrolysis by trypsin, were compared with that of intact phosvitin. RESULTS: Compared with intact phosvitin, PPPs exhibited distinctly stronger capability of inhibiting lipid oxidation in a linoleic acid system and more efficient radical-scavenging activity on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radicals. However, the chelating capability of PPPs on iron(II) was weaker than that of intact phosvitin. The strong antioxidant activity of PPPs can be mainly attributed to the amino acid composition rather than to the content of phosphorylserine ligands. Histidine, methionine and tyrosine are the amino acids most likely to be responsible for the strong antioxidant activity of phosvitin peptides. CONCLUSION: The present study indicated that PPPs could be used in foods as natural antioxidants with strong antioxidant activity. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".