Integration of rock physics, reservoir simulation, and time‐lapse seismic data for reservoir characterization at Weyburn Field, Saskatchewan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002Integration of rock physics, reservoir simulation, and time‐lapse seismic data for reservoir characterization at Weyburn Field, SaskatchewanAuthors: Leo T. BrownThomas L. DavisMichael BatzleLeo T. BrownColorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, Thomas L. DavisColorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, and Michael BatzleColorado School of Mines, Golden, COhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817008 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817008FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByThe Role of 4D Time Lapse Seismic Technology as Reservoir Monitoring and Surveillance Tool: A Comprehensive ReviewJournal of Natural Gas Science and EngineeringTime-lapse acoustic impedance variations during CO2 injection in Weyburn oilfield, CanadaYichuan Wang and Igor B. Morozov22 November 2019 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 85, No. 1An Economic Model of CO2 Geological Storage in Russian Energy Management System19 May 2019The influence of pore system change during CO 2 storage on 4D seismic interpretation18 November 2019 | Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d'IFP Energies nouvelles, Vol. 74Ordovician Red River Formation petrophysical analysis and seismic modelingPaul El Khoury, Thomas Davis, and Paul Anderson17 August 2017Study of 4D multicomponent forward model in porous and fractured medium during CO2 SequestrationYang Yang* and Jinfeng Ma31 May 2017Acoustic Properties of Reservoir Fluids-CO2 System2 April 2017Estimating reservoir permeabilities using the seismic response to CO2 injection and stochastic inversionInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 164D seismic modeling and CO2 pressure-saturation inversion at the Weyburn Field, SaskatchewanInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 164D rock and fluid properties analysis at the Weyburn Field, SaskatchewanInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 16Seismic characterization and time-lapse imaging during seven years of CO2 flood in the Weyburn field, Saskatchewan, CanadaInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 16CO2 rock physics as part of the Weyburn-Midale geological storage projectInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 16Anisotropic elastic moduli of carbonates and evaporites from the Weyburn-Midale reservoir and seal rocks14 February 2013 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 61, No. 2Fracture mapping using seismic amplitude variation with offset and azimuth analysis at the Weyburn CO2 storage siteAlexander Duxbury, Don White, Claire Samson, Stephen A. Hall, James Wookey, and J.-Michael Kendall27 September 2012 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 77, No. 6The Weyburn $$\hbox{CO}_{2}$$ Injection Project11 January 2012Inverting Shear-Wave Splitting Measurements for Fracture Properties11 January 2012Generating Anisotropic Seismic Models Based on Geomechanical Simulation11 January 2012Linking Geomechanical Modelling and Microseismic Observations at Weyburn11 January 2012Detection of multiple fracture sets using observations of shear-wave splitting in microseismic data14 February 2011 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 59, No. 4Linking microseismic event observations with geomechanical models to minimise the risks of storing CO2 in geological formationsEarth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 305, No. 1-2Geophysical Surveys and Data Analysis31 August 2010AVO modeling of pressure-saturation effects in Weyburn CO2 sequestrationJinfeng Ma and Igor Morozov11 February 2010 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 29, No. 2Exploring trends in microcrack properties of sedimentary rocks: An audit of dry-core velocity-stress measurementsDoug A. Angus, James P. Verdon, Quentin J. Fisher, and J.-M. Kendall3 September 2009 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 74, No. 5Integrated geophysical and geochemical research programs of the IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 monitoring and storage projectEnergy Procedia, Vol. 1, No. 1 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2002 Pages: 2478 publication data© 2002 Copyright © 2002 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished: 03 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION Leo T. Brown, Thomas L. Davis, and Michael Batzle, (2002), "Integration of rock physics, reservoir simulation, and time‐lapse seismic data for reservoir characterization at Weyburn Field, Saskatchewan," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1708-1711. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817008 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".