Global optimization with model-space preconditioning: Application to AVO inversion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Linearized-inversion methods often have the disadvantage of dependence on the initial model. When the initial model is far from the global minimum, optimization is likely to converge to a local minimum. Optimization problems involving nonlinear relationships between data and model are likely to have more than one local minimum. Such problems are solved effectively by using global-optimization methods, which are exhaustive search techniques and hence are computationally expensive. As model dimensionality increases, the search space becomes large, making the algorithm very slow in convergence. We propose a new approach to the global-optimization scheme that incorporates a priori knowledge in the algorithm by preconditioning the model space using edge-preserving smoothing operators. Such nonlinear operators acting on the model space favorably precondition or bias the model space for blocky solutions. This approach not only speeds convergence but also retrieves blocky solutions. We apply the algorithm to estimate the layer parameters from the amplitude-variation-with-offset data. The results indicate that global optimization with model-space-preconditioning operators provides faster convergence and yields a more accurate blocky-model solution that is consistent with a priori information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".