Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le texte de la Constitution française de 1958 ne recèle ni garantie de « droits fondamentaux », ni énoncé normatif traitant en substance du travail salarié. Mais les différentes branches de l’ordre juridique de la République ont été affectées par un processus jurisprudentiel de constitutionnalisation à deux composantes : la mise en évidence d’un « bloc de constitutionnalité » débordant le seul texte de la Constitution et l’affirmation de son emprise sur l’ensemble des rapports juridiques, y compris des rapports privés. Le dessin des bases constitutionnelles du droit du travail est, pour l’essentiel, à porter au crédit du Conseil constitutionnel, dont les décisions manifestent l’incidence complexe de ces normes supérieures sur la législation du travail. Cette autre action des normes constitutionnelles qu’est l’appréhension des relations du travail elles-mêmes apparaît dans des décisions des juridictions judiciaires, en particulier dans des arrêts de la Cour de cassation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".